ChatGPT理财降低账单AI 评分 · 待评分AI 辅助编辑·未发现明显提示词注入风险n8n.io

用 n8n 并行调用 GPT-4 与 Gemini 自动分析 Meta Ads 创意表现

输入 Meta Ads 数据或 Google Sheets 清单 → 提取指标 → 并行送 OpenAI/Gemini 对比基准 → 输出评分与操作建议到表格

经验丰富步骤流程提示词贴士
给谁
有 n8n 经验、需批量评估 Meta 广告创意的投放团队
你会得到
自动为每个创意生成 high/medium/low 评级、显著性判断与 scale/optimize/stop 建议,并汇总到 Google Sheets
你需要
n8n · facebook-graph-api · google-sheets · openai · gemini · schedule-trigger

硬约束

前置条件:n8n 实例;已配置凭证 facebookGraphApi、googleSheetsOAuth2Api、openAiApi、googlePalmApi。需准备历史基准数据 CSV。来源未提供费用信息。

他们做了什么

作者 hotgomer 在 n8n 上发布了一个 25 节点的模板工作流,用于自动分析 Meta Ads 创意表现。工作流通过 Schedule Trigger 定期启动,从 Meta Ads API 或 Google Sheets 获取创意列表,提取花费、展示、点击、安装、注册、加购、结账等指标,然后将每个创意的 CSV 数据与预设的历史基准 CSV 并行送入 OpenAI(gpt-4.1-nano)和 Gemini 两个 AI 模型,要求它们返回包含 evaluation、significance、summary、recommendation 的结构化 JSON,最后将原始指标与双模型分析结果回写到 Google Sheets 的同一行。

效果如何

来源报告该模板可自动完成以下事项:为每个创意生成 high/medium/low 评级;基于花费>49 且展示>10000 判断统计显著性;给出 scale/optimize/stop 建议;即使 AI 分析失败,原始指标也已先写入表格保证数据不丢失。(author_report)

值得知道

1. 提示词内嵌示例业务上下文(EasyBusy、长销售周期、无 Purchases 等),必须替换为你自己的业务描述和 KPI。2. 基准数据 benchmarks_data 的质量直接决定 AI 评分准确性;来源建议使用 Ads Manager 导出的高表现创意数据。3. 工作流使用 googlePalmApi 凭证连接 Gemini,非最新 Gemini API;若 n8n 版本更新可能需要调整凭证类型。4. OpenAI 节点实际调用 gpt-4.1-nano,非 GPT-4;Gemini 节点温度设为 0.4。5. 来源的 Further Ideas 提到可扩展自动预算调整、Slack 摘要报告、动态基准表等,但均属建议,非模板内置功能。6. 本站未实测,reproduction=not_tested;首次运行前请用少量数据测试并核对 Sheets 列名匹配。

n8n 工作流模板

结构已检查 · 未实际运行

下载后在 n8n 选择“Import from File”,或复制 JSON 后粘贴到编辑器。先配置自己的账号,再用测试数据运行;模板默认未启用。

配置与测试清单

需要绑定的凭证

  • Get Ads 节点:绑定facebookGraphApi 凭证。
  • Get Insights 节点:绑定facebookGraphApi 凭证。
  • Get Ad Details 节点:绑定facebookGraphApi 凭证。
  • Google Gemini Chat Model 节点:绑定Google Gemini/PaLM API 凭证。
  • Ad data from Gemini 节点:绑定Google Sheets OAuth2 凭证。
  • Ad data from OpenAI 节点:绑定Google Sheets OAuth2 凭证。
  • Send data to 4.1-NANO 节点:绑定OpenAI API 凭证。
  • Ad metrics 节点:绑定Google Sheets OAuth2 凭证。
  • Get Ads from Sheet 节点:绑定Google Sheets OAuth2 凭证。

需要替换的配置

  • 源模板来自 n8n 公开库 #6545(约 25 个节点)。导入后先保持未启用,核对触发器、表达式与外部 API 端点。
  • Sticky Note 中的说明仅供参考;按自己的账号、表结构或频道 ID 替换占位配置。

测试输入与预期结果

  • 在测试环境手动执行一次主路径,确认每个需凭证的节点已连接且无鉴权错误。
  • 用一条合成/脱敏样例数据跑通,核对输出字段与下游写入目标,再考虑生产启用。

模板处理说明

  • 已移除原作者凭证绑定、webhookId 与执行数据,工作流设为未启用;节点、连线与原文提示词保持原样。未在 n8n 中实际运行。
  • 未改业务逻辑;运行前请自行核对密钥、配额与隐私合规。

模板获取日期: 2026-10-24

步骤

  1. 配置凭证与中心参数节点

    在 n8n 中导入模板后,先连接四个凭证:Meta Ads、Google 账号(用于 Sheets)、OpenAI、Google Gemini(Palm)。然后打开 ⚙️ Set parameters 节点,设置三项:source 选 'Meta'(直接拉取广告系列)或 'sheets'(从 Google Sheet 读取 AdID 列表);campaign_id 填入 Meta 广告系列 ID(若 source=Meta);benchmarks_data 粘贴你的历史高表现创意数据 CSV,字段需与模板示例对齐。

  2. 配置三个 Google Sheets 节点

    将三个写入节点(Ad metrics / Ad data from OpenAI / Ad data from Gemini)指向同一个 spreadsheet 与 sheet。Ad metrics 的 Operation 设为 Append or Update;后两个设为 Update,以 AdID 为匹配列。确保表格已包含 AdID、FileName、spend、impressions、evaluation、summary、recommendation、evaluation G、summary G 等列。

  3. 设置触发器并激活工作流

    在 Schedule Trigger 节点设定运行频率(如每小时或每天)。保存并激活工作流。首次运行前建议用 Execute Workflow 手动测试,确认数据能正确写入 Sheets。【首次测试安全】首次测试前,先创建独立的测试 Google Sheet,将「Ad metrics」「Ad data from OpenAI」「Ad data from Gemini」三个 Sheets 节点临时指向该测试表,或仅用少量脱敏数据执行;确认列名匹配与写入内容正确后,再切回生产表格并激活 Schedule Trigger。

  4. 执行并行 AI 分析(OpenAI + Gemini)

    工作流运行时,Merge 后的创意数据会经 Code 节点转成 CSV,同时进入两条并行分支:一条送 OpenAI(gpt-4.1-nano)生成 JSON 数组评级;另一条送 Gemini AI Agent(带 Structured Output Parser)生成独立评级。两路结果分别回写到同一行的 OpenAI 列与 Gemini 列。

    运行提示词 · 来源原文。OpenAI 节点 Send data to 4.1-NANO 的 system message

    =You are the lead performance marketer at Digital Agency, a Meta Ads specialist.
    Your core strength is deep, objective analysis of creatives using funnel metrics (Impressions → Clicks → Installs → Registrations → Add to Cart → Checkouts Initiated).
    You compare test creatives with internal benchmarks and give clear recommendations on whether to scale, keep testing, or stop a creative.
    Your goal is to help make decisions, not just repeat the data.

    运行提示词 · 来源原文。OpenAI 节点 Send data to 4.1-NANO 的 user message

    =**BENCHMARKS_DATA (top-performing creatives with calculated metrics like CTR, CPC, CPA, ROAS, etc.)**
    *This is a CSV string with data from your top-performing creatives. All key metrics are pre-calculated here.*
    {{ $('Set parameters').item.json.benchmarks_data }}
    
    **ANALYSIS_DATA (raw test data without calculated metrics)**:
    
    {{ $json.creative_csv_data }}
    
    *Context*:
    	•	EasyBusy is a business aggregator.
    	•	Due to a long sales cycle (~30 days) and high average order value, there are no Purchases in the data.
    	•	We use Checkouts Initiated as a proxy conversion metric and also track the full funnel.
    
    **Your task**:
    	1.	Calculate the same metrics for the test creatives as in the benchmark data (CTR, CPC, CPA, ROAS, etc.).
    	2.	Compare each test creative against the benchmarks:
    	•	Metric-by-metric (e.g. higher CTR but worse CPC)
    	•	Funnel quality (is there drop-off or strength at any step?)
    	3.	Answer the following:
    	•	Do we have enough data to draw conclusions for each creative?
    	•	Which creatives are ready to scale now? Why?
    	•	Which creatives should continue testing?
    	•	Which creatives should be stopped?
    
    OUTPUT FORMAT — ONLY JSON ARRAY OF CREATIVES:
    
    Do not write any explanation, markdown, or formatting outside of the array. Just return a single JSON array like this:
    You must include ALL creatives in a SINGLE JSON array — not split across multiple responses. 
    Respond in ONE single message. Do NOT return one object per message.
    
    **Each object must follow this structure**:
    {
      "ad_id": "string (ad_id from ANALYSIS_DATA dataset)",
      "evaluation": "high | medium | low",
      "significance": "yes | no",
      "summary": "2–3 sentence explanation of why this creative got this score",
      "recommendation": "scale | optimize | stop"
    }
    
    *Example*:
    [
      {
        "ad_id": "1202153606616005",
        "evaluation": "high",
        "significance": "yes",
        "summary": "CTR and CPC are significantly better than benchmarks, with a strong funnel down to Checkouts Initiated.",
        "recommendation": "scale"
      },
      {
        "ad_id": "92021533361600510",
        "evaluation": "low",
        "significance": "yes",
        "summary": "Low CTR and high CPC. Almost no meaningful downstream activity.",
        "recommendation": "stop"
      }
    ]
    
    If there isn’t enough data, set "significance": "no" and clearly explain the reason in summary. Still provide the other fields.
    
    **Important**:
    	•	No markdown
    	•	No extra text
    	•	Output = only one clean JSON array

    运行提示词 · 来源原文。OpenAI 节点 Send data to 4.1-NANO 的 assistant message

    =Do not return each creative in a separate message. You must return a SINGLE JSON array that includes ALL creatives from the dataset.

    运行提示词 · 来源原文。Gemini AI Agent 节点 Send data to Gemini 的 text prompt

    =You are the lead performance marketer at Digital Agency, a Meta Ads specialist.
    Your core strength is deep, objective analysis of creatives using funnel metrics (Impressions → Clicks → Installs → Registrations → Add to Cart → Checkouts Initiated). You compare test creatives with internal benchmarks and give clear recommendations on whether to scale, keep testing, or stop a creative.
    Your goal is to help make decisions, not just repeat the data.
    
    INPUT DATA
    **1. BENCHMARKS_DATA**:
    *This is a CSV string with data from your top-performing creatives. All key metrics are pre-calculated here.*
    {{ $('Set parameters').item.json.benchmarks_data }}
    
    **2. ANALYSIS_DATA (raw test data without calculated metrics)**:
    {{ $json.creative_csv_data }}
    
    Context:
    	•	EasyBusy is a business aggregator.
    	•	Due to a long sales cycle (~30 days) and high average order value, there are no Purchases in the data.
    	•	We use Checkouts Initiated as a proxy conversion metric and also track the full funnel.
    
    **Your task:**
    1. Calculate metrics for each creative in ANALYSIS_DATA. Use the following formulas:
    - CTR (link click-through rate) = Link clicks / Impressions
    - CPC (cost per link click) = Amount spent (USD) / Link clicks
    - IPM (Installs per 1000 impressions) = App Installs / (Impressions / 1000)
    - Cost per App Install = Amount spent (USD) / App Installs
    - CR install to reg = Registrations completed / App Installs
    - Cost per registration completed = Amount spent (USD) / Registrations completed
    - Cost per add to cart = Amount spent (USD) / Adds to cart
    - Cost per checkout initiated = Amount spent (USD) / Checkouts initiated
    - If a denominator is zero, the resulting metric should be 0 or null.
    2. Analyze each creative from ANALYSIS_DATA according to the following rules:
    - Rule for determining statistical significance (significance):
    --Consider the data sufficient ("significance": "yes") if BOTH of the following conditions are met:
    --- Amount spent (USD) > 49
    --- Impressions > 10,000
    Otherwise, set "significance": "no".
    -Rule for evaluation (evaluation):
    -- Compare the key metrics of the test creative (CTR, CPC, Cost per App Install, Cost per checkout initiated) against the average values of the same metrics from the BENCHMARKS_DATA file.
    -- "high": The creative significantly outperforms the benchmark averages on key funnel metrics (e.g., higher CTR, and lower CPC and Cost per checkout initiated).
    -- "medium": The creative shows mixed results or performs on par with the benchmarks. For example, a good CTR but an expensive Cost per checkout initiated.
    -- "low": The creative significantly underperforms the benchmarks on most key metrics.
    3. Based on your analysis, provide a final JSON object containing the ad_id from the input data, and your calculated values for evaluation, significance, summary, and recommendation. For the summary, provide a 2-3 sentence explanation. If there is not enough data, set "significance" to "no" and explain why in the summary.

可复制提示词

搭建指导 · 本站建议版本。交给搭建助手,先确认输入和权限

这一段是提示词,页面不会在这里插入广告。

本模板为搭建启动词:请确认你已配置 facebookGraphApi、googleSheetsOAuth2Api、openAiApi、googlePalmApi 四项凭证,并在 Set parameters 节点中填入 source、campaign_id(如适用)及 benchmarks_data CSV。然后按步骤配置三个 Google Sheets 节点指向同一表格,最后设定 Schedule Trigger 并激活。

替换 EasyBusiness 等示例上下文为你自己的业务;benchmarks_data 质量直接影响评分准确性。

来源

Meta Ads Performance Analysis with GPT-4 & Gemini AI Comparisons · hotgomer · n8n.io · 2025-07-28

留言与反馈

试过这个方法吗?分享效果、遇到的问题或改进建议。留言审核后公开,请勿填写敏感信息。

正在加载…

    相关用例