Grok BotMoneyLower billsAI score · 83/100AI-assisted edit · no obvious prompt-injection riskGitHub

Contract / Policy Reviewer Bot (Field Notes Role Template)

Receive contract or policy → bot runs first-pass review flagging unusual clauses → outputs severity-rated issue list for human expert review

Some experienceStepsWorkflowPrompt
Who
Operations, events, or finance teams who need a fast first-pass screen of venue contracts or policies, producing a checklist for human expert review
You get
A severity-rated flag list (HIGH/MED/LOW) covering unusual clauses, missing protections, market-rate outliers, and questions for the counterparty; explicitly labeled as non-legal-advice first pass requiring human expert finalization
You need

Constraints

Create a new bot in a chat platform that supports role/system prompts (e.g., Grok, ChatGPT, Claude), paste the source role description into the system/role field, and replace placeholders. Trigger by sending the contract or policy text directly to the bot. No additional integrations or code deployment required. Output is a severity-rated flag list and must not be treated as legal advice or signing authority.

What they did

The source describes a bot referred to as Jenny Co's policy/contract-review bot (characterized as 'second-year law student' level). Its role is: upon receiving a contract or policy, read it fully, flag clauses that are unusual or one-sided, protections that are missing, numbers that look off versus market, and list questions to ask the counterparty.

How it went

The source does not report specific runtime results or quantified outcomes; it only states the output is 'a flag list with severity and a suggested question each,' and explicitly states it 'still needs human expert review for nuance and market rates.' (author_report)

Worth knowing

1. The source explicitly states the bot does not own legal sign-off ('Does not own: Legal sign-off') and does not negotiate. 2. README.md recommends keeping the 'needs approval' list as written until it has earned trust—do not relax human gates prematurely. 3. The source does not specify the underlying model version, only grok-bot. 4. This site has not tested the prompt's runtime effect on any platform. 5. Placeholders {NAME} and {HUMAN REVIEWER} must be replaced with actual names, or the prompt is incomplete.

Steps

  1. Create bot and paste role description

    In your chat platform, create a new bot, locate the system prompt or role description field, and paste the source prompt below in full. Replace {NAME} with the bot name (e.g., Contract Reviewer) and {HUMAN REVIEWER} with the actual person or title responsible for final review. Do not alter the rest of the instruction text.

    Setup guidance · Source text。The bot's system/role description field; use as the role setting after replacing placeholders

    You are {NAME}. When a contract or policy arrives, read it fully and
    produce a first-pass review: clauses that are unusual or one-sided,
    protections we'd expect that are missing, numbers that look off
    versus market, and the questions to ask. Rate each flag {HIGH / MED /
    LOW}. State clearly that this is a first pass for {HUMAN REVIEWER} —
    do not present it as legal advice.
  2. Set boundaries and approval gates (keep source recommendation)

    Per the source recommendation, keep the default 'Needs approval for' setting: the bot may read and flag without approval, but any action (replying to the counterparty, modifying terms, signing) requires human sign-off. The source explicitly warns: do not relax this gate until the bot has earned trust.

  3. Send contract or policy document to trigger review

    Send the full text of the contract or policy to the bot as a message. The source does not specify a required file format; paste plain text or upload a text-extractable PDF. The bot should then run the first-pass review automatically.

  4. Receive severity-rated flag list and conduct human review

    The bot's output should include: a severity rating (HIGH/MED/LOW) per flag, specific clause references, an explanation of the anomaly, and suggested questions to ask the counterparty. The source explicitly states this is a 'first pass' and still requires human expert review for nuance and market rates; it must not be treated as final legal advice or signing authority.

Prompt you can copy

Setup guidance · Editorial suggestion。Give to a setup assistant to create the bot in a chat platform and fill the role description; test with a sample contract after replacing variables

This block is the prompt. Ads are never placed here.

Paste the following role description into your bot's system/role field, replace the placeholders, and save:

You are {NAME}. When a contract or policy arrives, read it fully and
produce a first-pass review: clauses that are unusual or one-sided,
protections we'd expect that are missing, numbers that look off
versus market, and the questions to ask. Rate each flag {HIGH / MED /
LOW}. State clearly that this is a first pass for {HUMAN REVIEWER} —
do not present it as legal advice.

Then send the contract or policy text directly to the bot to trigger the review.

Replace {NAME} and {HUMAN REVIEWER} before saving; test with a sample contract that has known issues to verify output format on first use.

Source

contract-reviewer · unicodef1wn · GitHub · 2026-09-18

Comments & feedback

Tried this method? Share results, problems or improvements. Comments appear after moderation. Please avoid sensitive information.

Loading…

    Related